RichWatch.net » Miley Cyrus

Miley gets Photo-Belly-bombed

richard — Mon, 16 May 2011 06:49:02 +0000

Check out this picture and what do you see?
Nothin but lil ole Miley Cyrus at the beach right?

Then you scroll down and see the people who commented on the picture…

Preserve Cyrus…

richard — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:29:36 +0000

I’m not comfortable with this Miley Cyrus sexualization thing going on. While I’m 100% in favor of marketing hot jailbait as such, there are rules and requirements and Miley is just a cute little girl. she’s not sexually attractive. she looks and acts like a kid. that’s not cool. Britney Spears when she was 16? by all means – make us want to break the law and get up awn that. bitch be fine. But cool it on Miley you guys, c’mon.

Sources Warn Miley Cyrus Will Be Depleted by 2013: Unless Americans turn to alternative sources of entertainment, the ‘Hannah Montana’ star will soon be completely tapped out.

Behind the scene’s at the Miley Cyrus Vanity Fair shoot

richard — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:07:22 +0000

Vanity Fair released this behind the scenes’ featurette of the shoot:

Then the real unedited version of it:

BONUS slideshow:

and PS if you have no idea wtf these videos are about, here’s the Today Show on it:

The unpublicized Miley Cyrus Controversey: Why does she look like a skank?

richard — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:10:05 +0000

Like most, I too think its not appropriate for a 15 year old girl to be doing a topless photoshoot of any kind. The argument that it doesn’t show a lot of skin is one that misses the point by a mile. Yes, you can see more skin at the beach and yes Cyrus herself has shown more hot hot back-shoulder-and-arm action in award ceremony dresses – aren’t you clever for thinking of that. No. You’re not. The issue is about the context of such things. It’s the same reason its inappropriate for a girl to walk around in a bra and panties but notsomuch if she reveals even more skin in a bathing suit. Adults understand this.

So its by the same token that this Hannah Montana nude on a magazine cover should have been an obvious “are you fugging kidding me?” to any one of her 18million minders, handlers, agents, publicists and oh ya – parents. But whatever – the Cyrus’s say they were misled by the magazine into what the final product would actually be and are shocked and embarrassed now – okay, whatever. That’s not the point for me.

The thing I want to know why the media isn’t making a big deal about is that it’s not just that the photo is under an inappropriately sexy atmosphere, its that she looks like a thrice banged and discarded French whore.

What.. the hell… is with the pale skin, muted makeup and messy sexed hair on a gray background?? This is Tim Burton porn. I don’t get it at all.